Skip to main content

Shopping for a Change...or Not

As we finished out 2017 an article in The New York Times caught my eye and secured part of my 10 free articles for the month. Anne Patchett wrote about her year of no shopping.

This wasn't anything new to me - I've heard about no shopping or reduced shopping efforts before. For some reason, though, this article resonated with me - maybe because we had read one of her works for my book club this past year. Maybe because she is a book store owner, and therefore earns a special place in my heart.

I read the piece and then saved it as a PDF to my desktop. The point of the piece is simple. The writing is well done and conveys her experience. What would a year without shopping look like? Even more, what does that even mean? What can I buy? What can't I buy? Why?

She writes a compelling piece - no wonder, she's a compelling author. Part of what attracted me was that she first encountered the idea in 2009 and it took her 7 years later in 2016 to engage fully with the life experiment. She was writing as she wound down her year. Which brought her to an interesting intersection - keep going or return to shopping as before?

I printed the article and shared it with the kids over Shabbat. We talked about what it meant and if it was something we might want to try doing. Initially Tamar was very against it - give up shopping? Are you nuts?! The boys actually took to the idea nicely, although with a bit of hesitation. Perhaps it was a result of our countless conversations about not buying the cheap crap at the stores here and instead waiting for an opportunity to buy nicer items at a more reasonable price (Legos and Playmobil are twice the price here for no good reason!) instead of just buying cheap crap. Well, they've drunk the Kool-aid I was pouring!

After Shabbat ended we sat down as a family and made some decisions.
  • Food and consumables are allowed at the grocery or pharmacy
  • Eating out is okay
  • Presents should be in the form of a donation, book, activity, or homemade treasure
  • Office and school supplies are to be bought only as needed and only what is needed
  • Furniture and permanent items (in particular for our new house): only after we evaluate what we have and what we can source either free or second hand
  • Souvenirs are to be magnets, one per place for the whole family (that's easy - it's what we've typically done)
  • Electronics on a case-by-case basis for replacement or the new house
  • Try to buy small and local
The main point we came to was that this year would be about reducing consumption, consumerism, and waste. We want to focus on shifting the conversation from want to need, and recognizing what we already have. So far, two weeks in, we're doing okay! Check back with us in a few more months.

Comments

  1. I love how you made it a family discussion, and came up with a compromise everyone could agree to.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Macher or Schmoozer?

I'm working my way slowly through the book Bowling Alone by Robert Putnam . In a nutshell, which has to be pretty big because it's a hefty book, it's about social behaviors and the decline of them in the US - things like voting and participating in the political process at all levels, and engaging with volunteer and community efforts. Chapter six looks at Informal Social Connections. At paragraph two of the chapter he mentions the Yiddish words macher and schmoozer . That stopped me in my tracks for a moment. He continued to explain that fundamentally a macher is a doer, someone who makes things happen in the community. Whereas a schmoozer is a talker, a person with an active social life, someone who focuses on informal connections to others. And while it is certainly nice to sit and talk with someone, at the end of the day that's all a schmoozer does. Alternatively, the macher will sit and visit with you and then either your roped into helping or the macher...

Taking the time

Last night I went to a talk given by Dr. Avivah Gottlieb Zornberg last night. She spoke about guilt, atonement, and intimacy. My takeaway from this evening, even as I am still unraveling what she laid out for us is as follows. Elul has been described as like a bird hovering over a nest - waiting, ready to arrive, not yet there, but at the same time present. From this point she moved to the relationship between G-d and Moshe. After all of Moshe's hard work to build, carefully, diligently, the Tent of Meeting (אוהל מועד), Moshe remains outside, as if hovering over the nest, waiting to enter, unable to enter. Calling to others - as G-d calls to Moshe - is our way of calling attention to the other with whom we want to speak. Saying a person's name indicates that we have a desire to speak to her and elevates the communication, adding impact and intimacy of the conversation. Interestingly when Israelis talk to each other there is always a great amount of time asking each other...

A very fine line

There is a remarkably fine line between making excuses and offering explanations. It can be quite challenging to know the difference and that confusion can lead to difficulties. We work hard to help our children learn the difference between making an excuse for behavior versus offering an explanation to help figure out how or why something happened. Sometimes it is helpful to get the background but sometimes it just confuses matters. The balance between excuse and explain is similar to the one I have been pondering between blame and responsibility. Sometimes when we are trying to assign responsibility we actually end up placing blame. Both are a bit of a slippery slope that we should only start down with great caution. Strangely the challenge of excuses versus explanations is more easily addressed with children, which also tells me that it's more commonly understood as opposed to blame versus responsibility. We'd all do better to see the fine line between the two.