Skip to main content

The Bigger Explosion?

The big news of course is two pronged. On the one hand the "nuclear option" was exercised by Senator Mitch McConnell in the US Senate to abolish the 60 vote threshold for the confirmation of a nominee to the Supreme Court.

On the other hand we have the attacks carried out first by Assad on his own people in Syria - bringing the world painful images of his cruelty. The attack sparked a response from Republican President Trump to respond with air strikes. This back and forth may well bring the civil war in Syria to other countries and begin to engulf the world in greater and greater conflict. Time will tell and in the meantime stress levels will rise.

I was listening to the NPR One player that cued up the NPR Weekly Roundup from Thursday, April 6th. Mara Liasson was on the podcast and spoke at length about the issues surrounding McConnell's choice to eliminate the 60 vote threshold for Supreme Court nominees.

I find myself driven to do whatever I can to call out this behavior. Writing a blog post, reading articles and reposting on Facebook, spreading the word and the outrage however I can is what I can do. It is not nearly enough.

Mara Liasson made the point, starting at minute 6:00 in the podcast, that at this point now the party of majority has control and should that party be opposite the party of the President we are not likely to see confirmations of nominations from that President. We are witnessing the end result of the "polarization of judicial fights" that as Senator Chuck Schumer is heard on the podcast outlining, started nearly a generation ago.

I was struck by how much this action of Senator McConnell is a clear indication of the rise of partisanship, really an indication of how far down that rabbit hole the Republicans have gone. Senators Cruz, Burr, and McCain apparently stated during the 2016 Presidential Campaign that if Hillary were elected they would not confirm a single Supreme Court nominee from her administration - even for eight years! The height of immaturity and blatant partisanship to make such a declaration. And yet, they said it.

Their power has blinded them and brought the United States a form of leadership that is slowly and thoroughly demolishing the core institutions of Democracy. Protection of the minority opinion is a central pillar of Democracy. The loss of the minority protection provided by the 60 vote threshold, as Liasson pointed out (minute 14:00), takes us further into tribal politics, as parties must band together for the power they have in the majority role. It's a scary and disappointing day for American Democracy.

Shame is a powerful emotion. Shaming is a powerful tool. The American public must loudly and clearly shame our elected leaders who are behaving so horribly. The Democratic party must speak up and speak loudly against this perversion of the Democratic process and vow to change the rule back if they are returned to power. Respect for and of the minority opinion in Democracy is vital to it's survival. Perhaps the Republicans don't want it to survive. They are certainly doing themselves a disservice. So what are we going to do to call them out?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Macher or Schmoozer?

I'm working my way slowly through the book Bowling Alone by Robert Putnam . In a nutshell, which has to be pretty big because it's a hefty book, it's about social behaviors and the decline of them in the US - things like voting and participating in the political process at all levels, and engaging with volunteer and community efforts. Chapter six looks at Informal Social Connections. At paragraph two of the chapter he mentions the Yiddish words macher and schmoozer . That stopped me in my tracks for a moment. He continued to explain that fundamentally a macher is a doer, someone who makes things happen in the community. Whereas a schmoozer is a talker, a person with an active social life, someone who focuses on informal connections to others. And while it is certainly nice to sit and talk with someone, at the end of the day that's all a schmoozer does. Alternatively, the macher will sit and visit with you and then either your roped into helping or the macher...

Taking the time

Last night I went to a talk given by Dr. Avivah Gottlieb Zornberg last night. She spoke about guilt, atonement, and intimacy. My takeaway from this evening, even as I am still unraveling what she laid out for us is as follows. Elul has been described as like a bird hovering over a nest - waiting, ready to arrive, not yet there, but at the same time present. From this point she moved to the relationship between G-d and Moshe. After all of Moshe's hard work to build, carefully, diligently, the Tent of Meeting (אוהל מועד), Moshe remains outside, as if hovering over the nest, waiting to enter, unable to enter. Calling to others - as G-d calls to Moshe - is our way of calling attention to the other with whom we want to speak. Saying a person's name indicates that we have a desire to speak to her and elevates the communication, adding impact and intimacy of the conversation. Interestingly when Israelis talk to each other there is always a great amount of time asking each other...

A very fine line

There is a remarkably fine line between making excuses and offering explanations. It can be quite challenging to know the difference and that confusion can lead to difficulties. We work hard to help our children learn the difference between making an excuse for behavior versus offering an explanation to help figure out how or why something happened. Sometimes it is helpful to get the background but sometimes it just confuses matters. The balance between excuse and explain is similar to the one I have been pondering between blame and responsibility. Sometimes when we are trying to assign responsibility we actually end up placing blame. Both are a bit of a slippery slope that we should only start down with great caution. Strangely the challenge of excuses versus explanations is more easily addressed with children, which also tells me that it's more commonly understood as opposed to blame versus responsibility. We'd all do better to see the fine line between the two.