Skip to main content

Holding On...and Letting Go

It was a great summer stateside for the family, and it was a challenging one, for a variety of reasons. And then we returned to Israel to move into a new house and reconnect with all (well, most) of our worldly belongings. All of which lead to some deep thinking and personal evaluation.

Western culture (I can't speak beyond that) has developed a strong tendency to hold on - to hold on to everything. To save, to keep, to horde, anything and everything. 10 for $10 is the sale at the grocery to get you to buy more; digital cameras allow for unlimited picture taking at basically zero cost; $1 for the first month will rent you a self-storage unit for everything that won't fit in your house; make payments, nothing down for big ticket items; unlimited talk/text/data.

And so we do - we keep everything (well, my mom doesn't, but lots of people do) because we never know when we'll need it, or want it. And the wanting and needing continue and the consumption and consumerism grow - just looking at the things my kids acquired this summer, and it wasn't even that much.

But beyond the physical items, moving from a micro view of our personal day-to-day world out to the larger, macro view beyond ourselves (that's for you, dad), we find ourselves also holding onto our friends (thank you email, Facebook and the web in general). I would argue that this is probably better than worse for us. Maintaining connections we have made in our lives can be meaningful and fulfilling. On the flip side it can also feel burdensome and stifling as we hold on to the past, trying to remain as we once were for those times when we engage with our past.

Holding onto the past, seems to me, to be the most challenging of the opportunities to let go, to move on, to grow and adapt to life. I have a group of girl friends (well, there is one guy so far in the group) that dates back to middle school days. We get together for wine and catching up when I'm back in town over the summer. It had probably been 10 or more years since we had seen each other. And our first few get togethers ended up being rehashing and reminiscing about our days together as pre-teens. It was delightful and a bit trippy. But then, over time, we have moved on to new topics and conversations, allowing our relationship to (thankfully) grow beyond those middle school antics and mature into our new lives as working women, married women, divorced women, mothers, aunts, etc.

There are other relationships, though, where it is harder to let go, harder to move on. Our family, and our newly acquired family when we get married, are tangled up in all manner of complicated interpersonal relations and histories. On the one hand, we go back forever with our parents and our siblings and really there is little that isn't known in that circle. But then with our in-laws, we seem to look for that level of intimacy but of course can't find it and that can lead to difficulty and frustration. On the one hand, we are trying to grow and emerge as adults within the circle of our family and can find ourselves hindered and held back by the previous image our family had of us, and on the other hand, we want our in-laws to know that whole history so that they can understand where we are coming from when we say or do things - to help them have a context for behaviors.

So the challenge ahead, which, I believe we often don't or can't recognize is the need to just let go - to let go of who we thought people are (he's not your little brother, she's not your baby girl, etc), what our histories and stories are, and what we think behaviors might mean within the framework of our lives. It's a leap, a leap of faith, to just let go of what we know, what is safe and comfortable, and embrace the new for what it is and not worry about what it isn't.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Macher or Schmoozer?

I'm working my way slowly through the book Bowling Alone by Robert Putnam . In a nutshell, which has to be pretty big because it's a hefty book, it's about social behaviors and the decline of them in the US - things like voting and participating in the political process at all levels, and engaging with volunteer and community efforts. Chapter six looks at Informal Social Connections. At paragraph two of the chapter he mentions the Yiddish words macher and schmoozer . That stopped me in my tracks for a moment. He continued to explain that fundamentally a macher is a doer, someone who makes things happen in the community. Whereas a schmoozer is a talker, a person with an active social life, someone who focuses on informal connections to others. And while it is certainly nice to sit and talk with someone, at the end of the day that's all a schmoozer does. Alternatively, the macher will sit and visit with you and then either your roped into helping or the macher...

Taking the time

Last night I went to a talk given by Dr. Avivah Gottlieb Zornberg last night. She spoke about guilt, atonement, and intimacy. My takeaway from this evening, even as I am still unraveling what she laid out for us is as follows. Elul has been described as like a bird hovering over a nest - waiting, ready to arrive, not yet there, but at the same time present. From this point she moved to the relationship between G-d and Moshe. After all of Moshe's hard work to build, carefully, diligently, the Tent of Meeting (אוהל מועד), Moshe remains outside, as if hovering over the nest, waiting to enter, unable to enter. Calling to others - as G-d calls to Moshe - is our way of calling attention to the other with whom we want to speak. Saying a person's name indicates that we have a desire to speak to her and elevates the communication, adding impact and intimacy of the conversation. Interestingly when Israelis talk to each other there is always a great amount of time asking each other...

A very fine line

There is a remarkably fine line between making excuses and offering explanations. It can be quite challenging to know the difference and that confusion can lead to difficulties. We work hard to help our children learn the difference between making an excuse for behavior versus offering an explanation to help figure out how or why something happened. Sometimes it is helpful to get the background but sometimes it just confuses matters. The balance between excuse and explain is similar to the one I have been pondering between blame and responsibility. Sometimes when we are trying to assign responsibility we actually end up placing blame. Both are a bit of a slippery slope that we should only start down with great caution. Strangely the challenge of excuses versus explanations is more easily addressed with children, which also tells me that it's more commonly understood as opposed to blame versus responsibility. We'd all do better to see the fine line between the two.